Assemblymember Pete Grannis is after RIOC again. Once again,
it's over the Island's capital needs and how they will be met
without funding from the State budget.
Grannis says that important maintenance work is going undone,
pointing out that RIOC is contractually obligated to care for the
Island's non-residential structures.
"RIOC appears to be doing little more than crossing its
corporate fingers and hoping for a windfall from afar to meet its
financial obligations," Grannis writes in his March 15 letter.
"What you and the agency should be doing is leaving no stone
unturned, including seeking State assistance, to mitigate future
costs and avoid future problems by not allowing the work needed
today to go unattended."
Grannis lists a series of projects he considers critical:
$6.2 million required for seawall work, listed in a
still-secret Army Corps of Engineers report. About the report,
Grannis writes, "It is my understanding that you have resisted
accepting the final report presented to you by the Corps," and
asks why, adding "Has RIOC taken any action regarding the
eventual funding needed for this project?"
Blackwell House. "You were hoping to receive funding...
from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic
Preservation. What is the status of this request? If this
agency does not fund the project, what are your alternative
funding plans?"
Chapel of the Good Shepherd. Pointing to 1995 estimates
of $1.5 million in an engineering report, Grannis writes, "RIOC
has not, to my knowledge, ever sought to raise a penny for this
critical project either through the State or outside
sources."
Grannis goes on, "...it would appear that you and the [RIOC]
board are under the impression that somehow sufficient money can
be found through private and non-governmental sources. The
problem with this approach is that if you are wrong, these
facilities will continue to deteriorate."
Subsidies for neither the Island's capital needs nor its
operating expenses have not been in the State budget for several
years, and while the Governor has not spoken publicly on the
issue, he is known to feel the Island is, or should be,
self-sufficient.
By deadline, Ryan had not received the letter from Grannis. A
copy was supplied by The WIRE, but Ryan said he didn't feel he
could comment before receiving the letter from Grannis.
The full text of the Grannis letter is reprinted below.
March 15, 2001
Mr. Robert H. Ryan
President and Chief Operating Officer
Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation
591 Main Street
Roosevelt Island, NY 10044
Re: RIOC's Capital Budget
Dear Mr. Ryan:
I am writing to inquire about RIOC's progress in securing funding
for capital projects on Roosevelt Island, including repairs to
the seawall, Blackwell House and the Chapel of the Good
Shepherd.
This issue is of paramount concern to me and the Island's
residents since, as you well know, you did not request nor did
Governor Pataki provide, any financial support for RIOC's
activities in his proposed state budget for FY 2001-02.
Compounding my concern are your comments regarding the current
Southtown development in Dennis Hevesi's column in The New York
Times on Sunday January 14, 2001 (An Island With a History of
Change Awaits Its Latest Transformation): "The feeling of this
administration of RIOC is that the developer knows best and
government should take a back seat."
While this statement was offered in relation to the Southtown
project, it appears to me that it's a harbinger of the general
belief by management and at least some of RIOC's board members
that the private sector and free market forces have all the
answers and that government assistance is not needed for meeting
any of the Island's capital needs. The status of funding for the
three capital projects listed above points up my concern with
this approach.
According to the draft report released by the Army Corps of
Engineers in February 2000, the approximate cost for the work
needed on the seawall is $6.2 million. It is my understanding
that you have resisted accepting the final report presented to
you by the Corps. What are your reasons for this? Are you
questioning the Corps' cost projections, the scope of the
identified work or the phasing of its implementation? If any of
these, please provide me with details. Recognizing that work of
some magnitude is needed to ensure that the seawall will continue
to protect the integrity of the Island's landmass, has RIOC taken
any action regarding the eventual funding needed for this
project?
With regard to the repairs needed in Blackwell House, you told
me in our meeting last October that you were hoping to receive
funding for this project via a grant from the New York State
Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. What is
the status of this request? If this agency does not fund the
project, what are your alternative funding plans?
RIOC's approach to the third project, the Chapel of the Good
Shepherd, is one that I find particularly distressing. Armed
with an engineering report from 1995 that estimated the cost of
the work to be at least $1.5 million, RIOC has not, to my
knowledge, ever sought to raise a penny for this critical project
either through the State or outside sources. The only funding
for addressing the Chapel's deteriorating conditions has come
from the special appropriations now totaling $250,000 that I have
secured in the past few State budgets for the New York Landmarks
Conservancy to undertake this repair and restoration work.
Obviously more than this is needed. Where do you propose to find
it?
Based on your comments in the Hevesi article and elsewhere and
your actions to date regarding at least these three high profile
projects, it would appear that you and the board are under the
impression that somehow sufficient money can be found through
private and non-governmental sources. The problem with this
approach is that if you are wrong, these facilities will continue
to deteriorate.
Based on the City's lease with the State and the Island's
General Development Plan, it is clearly the responsibility of New
York State to maintain the Island's non-residential structures
and general infrastructure. Not only does this not appear to be
happening, but RIOC appears to be doing little more than crossing
its corporate fingers and hoping for a windfall from afar to meet
its financial obligations. What you and the agency should be
doing is leaving no stone unturned, including seeking State
assistance, to mitigate future costs and avoid future problems by
not allowing the work needed today to go unattended.
I look forward to your prompt response to the questions posed
herein and would appreciate your providing me with a list of all
the capital needs you have identified on the Island. Please call
me or Tony Morenzi if you have any questions regarding issues
raised in this letter.
Alexander B. Grannis
Member of Assembly
copies:
RIOC Board of Directors
Joseph B. Lynch, NYS Division of Housing and Community
Renewal
Hon. Carolyn Maloney
Hon. Olga Mendez
Hon. Gifford Miller
Matthew Katz, RIRA