Residents speaking last week at a presentation on a plan for
apartments at the Octagon presented a range of doubt about the
idea, ranging from violation of the Island's General Development
Plan (GDP) through concern that its mix of housing units wouldn't
contribute to population stability here.
Margie Smith, current Co-Convener of the Maple Tree Group (MTG)
and a litigant in the case against the current RIOC-endorsed plan
for Southtown, said of the Octagon, "We all want something there.
We don't want to leave it in ruins. ... But it was never meant
to be a residential site." While praising the developer, Becker
and Becker, Smith told the Becker team, "The GDP says there's a
basic program. There's going to be a new community. The new
community will be developed in two areas, Southtown and
Northtown. We've got Northtown, we may or may not have
Southtown, and [there is] open space to be developed as parks.
That wasn't the intent of the GDP, to put a residential building
there."
A Residents Association Common Councilor, Jeff Hochman,
emphasized Smith's point about the GDP: "You must understand
that Roosevelt Island is and has been and will remain a planned
community. The current [RIOC] administration does not want to
continue the planned community essence which is the basis of this
Island. If you look at the history of planned communities around
this country, once the buildings that were built did not continue
in the planning area, these communities ended. They just became
one part of a big maze of the city and their character had ended
and eroded."
Another MTG member and Southtown litigant, Linda Heimer,
emphasized that the GDP "is our only zoning. We don't have City
zoning here, and if we allow the GDP to be violated, it can be
violated with all other development." Referring the Marriott
Hotel plan for Southpoint, she added, "We don't want this to be a
commercial Island. It's a planned community for families and
residents."
On the matter of the apartment mix, RIRA Common Councilor Judith
Berdy told the Becker team, "To put 350 units into this at eight
stories is really cramming in a lot of units in a small space...
You do not bring families to Roosevelt Island... 33% studios,
60% one-bedrooms, and about six percent two-bedrooms? That is
bringing single people. That is not bringing families... That's
not bringing people that are interested in our community."
Berdy and Hochman also expressed concern about the Octagon
site being too far from the existing community to be integrated
into its life.
In response to the concerns, Bruce Becker said his firm is
willing to reconsider the apartment mix, and reconsider the focus
on biomedical research personnel. Hochman had said, emphasizing
a point made by Berdy, "If you continue with what they want to do
in Southtown, our Island is going to be overwhelmed by hospital
workers. I have no problem with hospital workers. But they are
temporary people, even doctors and nurses who stay here for one
or two years. We know this Island began as an Island of
hospitals. We don't want it to end the same way."
The Becker team was conciliatory toward the residents and Becker
emphasized he is sincere in wanting to accommodate community
concerns. He said that any proposal must be economically viable,
but said, "We're very resourceful," then adding, "I don't believe
that we would be designated [by RIOC as developer of the site] if
we didn't have some sort of economically-viable plan to start
with. But we're more than willing to revise if we can find other
sources of funding to be more oriented to public uses... My
sense is, that would be challenging... I would certainly make the
commitment to pursue it."
Residents speaking at the meeting praised the Becker team for
forthrightness and the quality of their plan, but lamented that
RIOC has moved forward on development of a site not provided for
as residential housing in the GDP.