|
|
|
October 21, 2000 |
|
RIRA President Candidates' Views on Asking Referendum Question on Local Election of RIOC Board Members
Whether or not Roosevelt Island residents should seek the right
to elect a majority of the members of the RIOC Board of Directors
has emerged as the defining issue of the year 2000 campaign to
lead the Residents Association. Here is a condensation (a
fuller transcript is available on Website NYC10044
www.nyc10044.com) of what the two candidates for the RIRA
Presidency said about the referendum in the RIRA Common Council
meeting that agreed, 13 to 8, to put it on the November 7
ballot:
Patrick Stewart "I'm against any kind of a referendum, to tell you the truth,
because it's too complex. We are asking people to
understand what we understand over many years here in
conference... "It is very important that we understand what's going on
here... Why would the new RIOC Board be able to do any
more than the old RIOC Board would? The new RIOC board
would not have any more money than the old Board would.
Understand that the 8.5 million dollars gross revenue that comes
to RIOC is used to run the Island, to maintain the Island, not to
fix the infrastructure, not to pay for legal bills, not to pay
for anything other than hopefully keeping the street the way it
is. "The projected new Board is assuming all the obligations on
behalf of the Island that the present Board has. The
present Board has well in excess of 300 million dollars in
obligations. Where is this new Board going to get the
money the old Board can't get? Is Pete Grannis gonna get
us $500,000? That's not $300 million. Is Gifford
Miller gonna get us some trees? That is not going to do
it. "This is fiscal irresponsibility. It is financial
suicide to do these things. No matter how you look at it,
the numbers don't add up to a fiscally responsible policy for the
Island. Please understand that you've got $40 or $50
million of infrastructure debt, you've got $200 million in bonds
to be paid off, you've got capital spending that hasn't been done
for lo these many years, and you have $20,000 in the bank to do
it with. The money is not there. You can hire all
the management in the world, you can have every one of the people
in RIOC being an expert in whatever it is, the money isn't
there. You can't operate without money. There is no
program to get money. That's it, pure and simple. "So, do we want to take on that obligation on behalf of our
neighbors to say, 'We're going to go out and get some neighbors
here, and they will take care of it'? They will not take
care of it because they can't borrow money without the State,
they can't float bonds without the State, they can't tax because
it's illegal to do that. So where is this money going to
come from? It isn't. It isn't there and it will not
be there. That's simple."
Matthew Katz "We want to elect RIOC, and we want RIOC to hire professional
management. [As for] financial responsibility - whether it
is this RIOC or a [new] RIOC, it is still a public benefit
corporation and the responsibility of the State. That
doesn't change. If the State wants to allocate subsidies
to this Island, it can do so under a RIOC1 or a RIOC2
Board. There's nothing to prevent it. What does
change is that the political status of the Island is no longer
there. This is no longer a Board appointed by a Republican
Governor. It's just a Board. And so the strictures
against giving money to someone of a different party no longer
are there. If Pete Grannis wants to get us $600,000 there
is a RIOC Board that is prepared to accept it. That's not
the case now. So what we are doing is not changing
anything about whether we can accept money from the State. "Also, I would bring to your attention this whole question of
the deductible. The deductible as it exists now in the
Assembly bill is $250,000; in the Senate bill, $500,000.
The current responsibility of this RIOC is $6 million for the
seawall repairs, $40 million or $50 million, depending on when
you ask, for the infrastructure of the entire Island, $4.5
million to connect the existing infrastructure to phase one of
Southtown. The current RIOC is responsible for the whole
kit and caboodle, because there's no one else to pick up those
costs. What this legislation will offer us is an
opportunity to limit liability, because one way or another,
somebody's got to fix this Island. "[As for the City] If they bide their time and wait 66 years,
they get a completely developed Island back as a cash cow.
So I'm not sure why the City would consider taking us back under
our present situation. Also, I wonder why we would want
this to happen. [If] we go back to the City, the first
thing that goes is the Master Lease [and] the General Development
Plan... We should have an idea of what kind of protections
we can expect from the City. "This is a country in which there are three levels of
government, federal, state, local. Each of those levels of
government is elected by the people they serve. And I
think that is essential to any kind of government here on
Roosevelt Island."
|