As Island leaders look at legislation brought forth by the Maple
Tree Group after two years of research and quiet (though
public) effort, there's a distrust in the air.
Residents find themselves asking, Why is the Governor suddenly so
willing to sign off on self-governance for Roosevelt
Island?
The premise behind the question is that the Governor must so
dislike Roosevelt Island that he's willing to use his office
to hurt us.
No wonder there's distrust. For three years, the Albany
administration of George Pataki was utterly unresponsive to
complaints about Jerome Blue - just as unresponsive as Blue
himself. Furthermore, Blue's every move seemed designed to
alienate concerned residents, and the paranoid secrecy at
Bunker RIOC created a gnawing suspicion that residents'
needs were low-priority - perhaps even that residents were
expendable in Blue's eyes.
But the Governor's reasons for sticking us with three years of
Blue were his political debt to Al D'Amato, almost surely,
and the cries of pain were probably ignored because, after
all, we're not only New York City, but we're mostly
Democrats, and in the grand scheme of things, we're small
potatoes.
And the Governor's motives for signing on to the self-governance
idea are probably not as dark as Blue's seemed to be.
Whether Pataki moves on to a Vice Presidential nomination or
stays in Albany, he serves himself best if he pacifies this
Island. He's not likely to do that successfully by
programming self-governance to fail.
We would do well, then, to examine the self-governance plan, and
the Governor's contribution to it, at face value, as hard as
that may be. There are enough difficulties in evaluating a
substantial change in the Island's route into the future
without viewing Albany through Blue-colored glasses.