April 24, 1999
The RIRA Column

After 5 months of serving on the RIRA Common Council, one thing strikes me again and again. As we’re succeeding in getting more high-level political attention and as we’re successfully positioning ourselves within the key decision-making bodies on issues such as development and growth – the more we seem to be communicating the message that we’re embattled and losing.

Graham Cannon

This edition’s guest columnist is Graham Cannon, RIRA’s Director of Communications. Graham is currently Director of Strategy and Communications for Time Inc. New Media. Before joining Time Inc. New Media, Graham was Deputy Communications Director for U.S. Ambassadors Madeleine Albright and Bill Richardson at the UN. He was responsible for a range of strategic media initiatives, including those for Bosnia and Iraq.

Prior to that position, he was a Senior Adviser to the International Operations Subcommittee of the House of Representatives, where he specialized in international broadcasting and communications. He also served as Press Secretary and Legislative Assistant for California Congressman Howard L. Berman in Washington and Los Angeles.

Graham has reported for the London Daily Mail, BBC and NBC Radio, and Microsoft’s on-line publication, Slate.

Why is this so? In part it’s because we’ve taken to gauging our success by whether Jerry Blue gets fired. We made it personal when the reality is that you don’t get to choose your political opponent; and as attractive as it seems, removing someone you dislike outside of regular political channels is always a tough, usually impossible task. Just ask Henry Hyde.

Look at the facts. Over the last couple of years, through the hard-work, persistence and skill not just of Common Council members but a broad swath of Islanders, we’ve actually succeeded in drawing attention to legitimate questions about some of the deficiencies and dangers in Dr. Blue’s policies and performance. Two years ago Dr. Blue was sent here with the undisputed authority and the mandate of a popularly-elected governor to implement a policy of reducing, preferably to zero, the island’s dependence on public funds while figuring out a way of developing as many revenue streams as possible for the State out of the island’s assets. Today, his power to act is under steady erosion His own boss, DHCR Commissioner Joe Lynch, responding to concerns that Dr. Blue was struggling, told the New York Times that "if we can help him do his job, that’s a good thing," in other words, the bureaucratic equivalent of a knife in the back. Lynch not only helped engineer the appointment of RIRA President Patrick Stewart and Island resident Susan Whitaker to the RIOC Board, but he created two new committees, half of whose members are residents, including Stewart, to advise RIOC on future development for the Island.

And now that we’ve gained a seat at the table, I’d suggest channeling our energy and enthusiasm towards developing three strategic goals. First, and most important, we can’t simply oppose everything, while reacting defensively from crisis to crisis – we have to proactively figure out and then articulate what we’re actually for. Second, we should recognize that progress from here on out will depend as much on clever and nuanced negotiating tactics as on our proven skill at campaigns and sloganeering. So we’ll have to become fact-bearing experts in every relevant detail of city and state policy, law and regulation. Third, as we become more enmeshed in politics we’ll need to do more of what we’re already doing – building the broadest network of personal relationships and alliances, on and off the island, that are the lifeblood of successful political endeavor.

To begin with, I propose we move quickly to draft and approve, possibly by Island-wide referendum, a statement of principles that reflects who we are and what we seek for ourselves. Our own Charter 2000. For instance, where do we stand on development? Do we oppose mini-schools because some views might be impeded, because of construction traffic or because the developer misled us? And what’s our alternative for utilizing what are currently vacant, decaying buildings? How about Southpoint? Is our position no development ever, or do we support negotiating limited development in return for some public parkland? Are the Island’s original General Development and Master Plans always inviolable? Can they be amended to address issues never envisaged by the original planners?

Defining where we stand becomes more urgent even as new avenues for dialogue emerge, because I’m also convinced that we’ll have to take to the barricades many times as we address these critical issues over the next few years. I’m sure that we’ll have to block Main Street once or twice before we’ll get action on abating construction traffic access for Southtown or head to court to enforce a commitment or oppose a variance. But ultimately these tactics will work only if they derive from an alternative, complete strategy.

1990’s Manhattan is about to hit our Island with full force. Let’s make sure that we’re ready to meet it.

 

Top of
  Website NYC10044  
The Main Street WIRE
  Last     Next     Current  
  About The WIRE  
  Issue list     Ad Rates