|
After 5 months of serving on the
RIRA Common Council, one thing strikes me again and again. As we’re succeeding
in getting more high-level political attention and as we’re successfully
positioning ourselves within the key decision-making bodies on issues such as
development and growth – the more we seem to be communicating the message that
we’re embattled and losing.
|

|
|
This
edition’s guest columnist is Graham Cannon, RIRA’s Director of
Communications. Graham is currently Director of Strategy and
Communications for Time Inc. New Media. Before joining Time Inc.
New Media, Graham was Deputy Communications Director for U.S.
Ambassadors Madeleine Albright and Bill Richardson at the UN. He
was responsible for a range of strategic media initiatives,
including those for Bosnia and Iraq.
Prior
to that position, he was a Senior Adviser to the International
Operations Subcommittee of the House of Representatives, where he
specialized in international broadcasting and communications. He
also served as Press Secretary and Legislative Assistant for
California Congressman Howard L. Berman in Washington and Los
Angeles.
Graham
has reported for the London Daily Mail, BBC and NBC Radio,
and Microsoft’s on-line publication, Slate. |
|
Why is this so? In
part it’s because we’ve taken to gauging our success by whether Jerry
Blue gets fired. We made it personal when the reality is that you don’t
get to choose your political opponent; and as attractive as it seems,
removing someone you dislike outside of regular political channels is
always a tough, usually impossible task. Just ask Henry Hyde.
Look at the facts.
Over the last couple of years, through the hard-work, persistence and
skill not just of Common Council members but a broad swath of Islanders,
we’ve actually succeeded in drawing attention to legitimate questions
about some of the deficiencies and dangers in Dr. Blue’s policies and
performance. Two years ago Dr. Blue was sent here with the undisputed
authority and the mandate of a popularly-elected governor to implement a
policy of reducing, preferably to zero, the island’s dependence on
public funds while figuring out a way of developing as many revenue
streams as possible for the State out of the island’s assets. Today, his
power to act is under steady erosion His own boss, DHCR Commissioner Joe
Lynch, responding to concerns that Dr. Blue was struggling, told the New
York Times that "if we can help him do his job, that’s a good
thing," in other words, the bureaucratic equivalent of a knife in the
back. Lynch not only helped engineer the appointment of RIRA President
Patrick Stewart and Island resident Susan Whitaker to the RIOC Board, but
he created two new committees, half of whose members are residents,
including Stewart, to advise RIOC on future development for the Island.
And now that we’ve
gained a seat at the table, I’d suggest channeling our energy and
enthusiasm towards developing three strategic goals. First, and most
important, we can’t simply oppose everything, while reacting defensively
from crisis to crisis – we have to proactively figure out and then
articulate what we’re actually for. Second, we should recognize that
progress from here on out will depend as much on clever and nuanced
negotiating tactics as on our proven skill at campaigns and sloganeering.
So we’ll have to become fact-bearing experts in every relevant detail of
city and state policy, law and regulation. Third, as we become more
enmeshed in politics we’ll need to do more of what we’re already doing
– building the broadest network of personal relationships and alliances,
on and off the island, that are the lifeblood of successful political
endeavor. |
To begin with, I propose we move
quickly to draft and approve, possibly by Island-wide referendum, a statement of
principles that reflects who we are and what we seek for ourselves. Our own
Charter 2000. For instance, where do we stand on development? Do we oppose
mini-schools because some views might be impeded, because of construction
traffic or because the developer misled us? And what’s our alternative for
utilizing what are currently vacant, decaying buildings? How about Southpoint?
Is our position no development ever, or do we support negotiating limited
development in return for some public parkland? Are the Island’s original
General Development and Master Plans always inviolable? Can they be amended to
address issues never envisaged by the original planners?
Defining where we stand becomes
more urgent even as new avenues for dialogue emerge, because I’m also
convinced that we’ll have to take to the barricades many times as we address
these critical issues over the next few years. I’m sure that we’ll have to
block Main Street once or twice before we’ll get action on abating
construction traffic access for Southtown or head to court to enforce a
commitment or oppose a variance. But ultimately these tactics will work only if
they derive from an alternative, complete strategy.
1990’s Manhattan is about to
hit our Island with full force. Let’s make sure that we’re ready to meet it.
|