November 7, 1998 |
| Three Viewpoints: Getting Serious About Self-Government | ||
|
A Bid for RI? | ||
|
On Tuesday, we elected people to represent us at the Federal, State and City levels of government. On Tuesday, we also voted overwhelmingly in favor of the self-evident notion that we on Roosevelt Island should be able to vote for people to represent us at the local level of government as well.
It's been some time since I attended a Town Meeting. By the end of this one, two things seemed clear to me. This Won't Be Easy... Is There An Alternative? Grannis, a Democratic Assemblymember, explained that the legislative process would require the active support of a Republican member of the State Senate. Republicans control the latter body and it is almost impossible to pass legislation without their support. The legislation would then have to pass through the Governor's office. It would be impossible, Grannis explained, to override a Pataki veto. Given those barriers, it seems prudent to have an alternative plan. A possibility is a Business Improvement District (BID). In many parts of the City, you can see security and maintenance services being provided by uniformed individuals who are not, however, wearing New York City uniforms. A consortium of local businesses and residents who pay for their services - a BID - employs these people. There is existing legislation that provides for the creation of these BIDs. Their creation requires the cooperation of City government. A BID could provide most - perhaps even all - of what we are looking for in self-rule without requiring the State Legislature to pass legislation. While I think it would be preferable to have home rule for Roosevelt Island established by an act of the Legislature, we should put some energy into simultaneously investigating what it would take to create a Business Improvement District for our community. This Won't Be Easy... We'll Need Money Another thing seemed clear at the Town Meeting. Some of the attendees
believed that Roosevelt Island could expect to see its State subsidy return
if only we had local rule. The rationale for our State subsidy was that we were to become self-sufficient when our population reached 20,000. We've been stuck at under half that number because the State did not complete its task of developing the Island. We can't expect the State to continue its support if the community blocks further development. Of course, the State can't expect the community to allow development to proceed without significant participation by our representatives in the process. But we mustn't delude ourselves. If we win the right to self-rule, our representatives will be faced with substantial financial problems - problems that will require further development for their resolution. Jack Resnick
|
||
|
||
|
|